Comments on: “Antichrist” Shot on RED http://camerarentalz.com Sun, 01 Jan 2012 16:00:22 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: vincent http://camerarentalz.com/antichrist-shot-red/comment-page-1/#comment-60396 vincent Fri, 30 Sep 2011 14:12:39 +0000 http://camerarentalz.com/?p=2248#comment-60396 the magic of first love is our ignorance that it never ends the magic of first love is our ignorance that it never ends

]]> By: haythm http://camerarentalz.com/antichrist-shot-red/comment-page-1/#comment-42763 haythm Sat, 23 Apr 2011 07:18:03 +0000 http://camerarentalz.com/?p=2248#comment-42763 i wanna say somthing the antichrist he only have one eye and in the same time i neer saw any movie talking about his story in real i wanna say somthing the antichrist he only have one eye and in the same time i neer saw any movie talking about his story in real

]]> By: sameer http://camerarentalz.com/antichrist-shot-red/comment-page-1/#comment-37226 sameer Fri, 04 Mar 2011 14:53:40 +0000 http://camerarentalz.com/?p=2248#comment-37226 i like it i like it

]]> By: stefan http://camerarentalz.com/antichrist-shot-red/comment-page-1/#comment-4392 stefan Mon, 19 Apr 2010 19:45:52 +0000 http://camerarentalz.com/?p=2248#comment-4392 I watched this film projected digitally and saw no pink artifacting/fringing. This is also something that, if seen in a final master, would most certainly be a projection/printing issue. The entire movie is so heavily timed that the "b/w" section would definitely have all color information removed. Even if the camera did have color issues, they wouldn't (or shouldn't) be seen in a final printout. If you saw this film projected from a film print, it is quite possible that it was an issue with the film stock. It is notoriously difficult to accurately (or even close to accurate) print bw on color stock. I watched this film projected digitally and saw no pink artifacting/fringing. This is also something that, if seen in a final master, would most certainly be a projection/printing issue. The entire movie is so heavily timed that the “b/w” section would definitely have all color information removed. Even if the camera did have color issues, they wouldn’t (or shouldn’t) be seen in a final printout. If you saw this film projected from a film print, it is quite possible that it was an issue with the film stock. It is notoriously difficult to accurately (or even close to accurate) print bw on color stock.

]]> By: Johan Glas http://camerarentalz.com/antichrist-shot-red/comment-page-1/#comment-1994 Johan Glas Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:51:47 +0000 http://camerarentalz.com/?p=2248#comment-1994 Thank you, Alex, for your reaction, And for the information, which brings me to the question: Does this Phantom-camera have difficulties with black and white? Because that was my main quistion. Thank you, Alex, for your reaction,

And for the information, which brings me to the question: Does this Phantom-camera have difficulties with black and white? Because that was my main quistion.

]]> By: Alex http://camerarentalz.com/antichrist-shot-red/comment-page-1/#comment-1992 Alex Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:43:02 +0000 http://camerarentalz.com/?p=2248#comment-1992 The opening and ending were shot with the Phantom - the rest with RED The opening and ending were shot with the Phantom – the rest with RED

]]> By: Johan Glas http://camerarentalz.com/antichrist-shot-red/comment-page-1/#comment-1338 Johan Glas Fri, 30 Oct 2009 07:57:16 +0000 http://camerarentalz.com/?p=2248#comment-1338 Allthough astonishing material for a digital camera, I was wondering if the Red One has some difficulties with black&white. During the epilogue of Antichrist I saw some minor pink on the left and minor green on the right of the picture. At that moment I did not know that it was shot with the Red One and I was wondering what I was seeing. Anyone recognizes this artifact? Allthough astonishing material for a digital camera, I was wondering if the Red One has some difficulties with black&white. During the epilogue of Antichrist I saw some minor pink on the left and minor green on the right of the picture. At that moment I did not know that it was shot with the Red One and I was wondering what I was seeing. Anyone recognizes this artifact?

]]>